Opportunities for Indian Occupational Therapists for Private Practice in Mental Health: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION

Occupational therapy, a holistic and client-centered profession, plays a crucial role in addressing the needs of individuals with physical, psychosocial, and cognitive impairments. Within this diverse field, the realm of mental health holds particular significance. Occupational therapists (OTs) have become integral members of multidisciplinary teams in mental health services, acknowledging their pivotal role in enhancing the occupational well-being of patients.^1–7

As healthcare trends shift away from institutional settings, the private practice model is gaining prominence among OTs. This transition allows for greater flexibility and accessibility in delivering therapy services, especially in underserved rural areas. However, it also presents challenges, as OTs must balance their clinical expertise with the practical aspects of running their practices.^8–10

In the context of India’s occupational therapy profession, there is a promising resurgence, evident in the growing number of educational programs and diverse practice settings. Still, a comprehensive understanding of the profession’s dynamics, especially in the private sector, remains a valuable opportunity. Gathering data on OTs working in private practice can provide nuanced insights into the evolving landscape of occupational therapy in India.^11,12

The limited published data on private practice opportunities presents an exciting chance. This study, focusing on Indian OTs, aims to uncover valuable insights from their perspectives. Rather than seeing the lack of data as a challenge, this study embraces it as an opportunity to explore uncharted territory. By delving into therapists’ experiences, it enriches the field with firsthand knowledge. The study’s dual focus on identifying opportunities and strategies reflects its forward-thinking nature. Instead of fixating on limitations, it’s driven by innovation and finding new ideas for therapists to establish successful private practices.^13–16

METHODOLOGY

This study employs a qualitative phenomenological research design to explore the opportunities and strategies for OTs in private practice specializing in mental health within the Indian context. Participants include OTs with a minimum of 2 years of experience in mental health practice within India. A snowball sampling method is utilized for participant recruitment, ensuring access to individuals with specialized knowledge in this field.

Data collection involves telephonic interviews with a sample size of six OTs. These interviews are conducted in English, with translations made if necessary for non-English comments. Thematic analysis is employed to analyze the transcribed interviews, identifying patterns and themes to uncover valuable insights into the opportunities for OTs in private mental health practice. The findings will contribute valuable insights to the field and offer practical guidance for OTs looking to establish successful private practices in the mental health domain.^17–19

FINDINGS

In this study, we delve into the experiences of mental health OTs in private practice, aiming to shed light on their unique roles and challenges. Through our findings, we aspire to achieve two overarching goals. First, we offer a comprehensive exploration of the opportunities that beckon within private practice for mental health OTs. Second, we recognize the potential of our findings to contribute to the broader discourse within the field, serving as a source of inspiration, reflection, and dialogue for practitioners, educators, policymakers, and fellow researchers. In this section, through participant narratives, we uncover the complexities and transformative potential of this profession and present thematic findings that reflect the voices of these practitioners and offer valuable insights into the field.²⁰

DISCUSSION

The findings of this qualitative study open the door to a rich discussion surrounding the experiences of mental health OTs in private practice. This research unveils their unique roles and the challenges they confront, setting the stage for a comprehensive discussion on the opportunities that exist within private practice for mental health occupational therapists.^21–26

The theme of networking dynamics emerged as a cornerstone of success in private practice for mental health OTs. The participants’ insights highlight the importance of building professional relationships, collaborating with various stakeholders, and fostering a supportive environment to enhance the effectiveness and impact of mental health occupational therapy.

The complementary nature of occupational therapy and working alongside psychiatrists not only reinforces the professional identity of mental health OTs but also enhances the overall quality of care provided.^13–16

Hurff and Kamat, suggest that networking with psychiatrists can help OTs extend their role into nontraditional settings. This collaboration improves relationships with clients by creating a holistic approach to mental health care. Thus, networking dynamics in the private practice of mental health occupational therapy is an important aspect.

Long’s practical guide further reinforces the need for therapists to engage with the available evidence. Standardized procedures supported by evidence resonate with clients, enhancing the credibility of private practitioners.

Our participants stressed that the need to stay updated with the latest research provides cutting-edge, evidence-based interventions. Participants also emphasized the significance of engaging in meaningful conversations, presenting case studies, and discussing research papers to bridge disciplinary gaps and boost visibility, thus facilitating referrals.^26–28

Evidence based practice, along with standardized procedures, ongoing research, and interprofessional collaboration, not only ensures high-quality care but also distinguishes private practitioners and advances the field of mental health occupational therapy. Literature reinforces the value of EBP in enhancing care quality and therapists’ positive attitudes.^19,22

New horizons in mental wellness illuminated the willingness of mental health OTs to explore innovative domains within their practice along with a focus on the establishment of community-based day care centers which offer specialized care and purposeful activities, broadening the scope of mental health occupational therapy.

Participants express keen interest in venturing beyond traditional clinical settings, embracing versatility in contexts and exploring specialized domains, such as neuropsychiatry and child psychiatry, geriatric psychiatry, community psychiatry, forensic psychiatry, and child psychiatry which aligns with research on therapists’ various roles.²⁴

They integrate alternative practices like mindfulness and yoga, endorsing holistic mental well-being, and aligning with research on effective interventions. Collaboration with professionals from related fields, such as neurologists and psychiatrists, is seen as essential in providing comprehensive care to diverse populations.^23,25

Lastly, community outreach and advocacy were recognized as vital components of private practice as our participants stressed active community engagement and advocacy as integral to mental health occupational therapy. Collaborating with healthcare professionals, especially psychiatrists, enhances recognition.^26,29,30

Grassroots advocacy within local communities involves actively raising awareness; engaging with external resources and organizations that can lead to increased referrals and greater community recognition; benefiting private practice and influencing the overall narrative surrounding mental healthcare.

Furthermore, embracing the local community and platforms enriches practitioners’ knowledge and can be leveraged to enhance private practice and advocate for occupational therapy.

In summary, our participants’ insights underscore the multifaceted nature of community outreach and advocacy in mental health occupational therapy, for advancing the profession and improving the quality of care offered, with literature evidence supporting these perspectives.^27–29

Gathered perspectives and insights of the participants were related to their practice and may be biased but their experiences enrich our understanding and offer valuable guidance for practitioners interested in private practice.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of private practice in mental health occupational therapy within India. Networking dynamics, collaboration with psychiatrists, EBPs, exploration of new horizons, and community outreach collectively form the foundation for success in this field. This study has enlightened me with various opportunities while future research studies may explore the challenges faced by mental health occupational therapists in private practice benefiting practitioners and policymakers seeking to advance the field. Mental health OTs in private practice have the potential to not only provide high-quality holistic care but also to shape and advance the entire discipline through their dedication, innovation, and advocacy. As the field continues to evolve, embracing these opportunities will be essential in meeting the diverse needs of individuals seeking mental health support and care.

ORCID

Suraj Nayak https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1448-8675

REFERENCES

1. Occupational Therapists & Mental Health Practice, AIOTA. Available at: https://aiota.org/about_ot (Accessed: 10 November 2023).

2. Gee BM, Zimmerman S, Hinds J, et al. A dialogue regarding the current status of Mental Health and occupational therapy practice in the United States. Open J Occup Ther 2022;10(3)1–9. DOI: 10.15453/2168-6408.2072.

3. Christiansen C, Haertl K. A contextual history of occupational therapy: In Schell B, Gillen G (Eds.), Willard & Spackman’s Occupational Therapy (Centennial, 13th Edition). 2019; Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer. pp. 11–42.

4. Occupational therapy act scope of practice and controlled acts. College of Occupational Therapists of Ontario (COTO). 1991. Available at: https://www.coto.org/registrants/practice-support/ot-scope-of-practice (Accessed: 10 November 2023).

5. Long C, Cronin-Davis J, Cotterill D (Eds). Occupational Therapy Evidence in Practice for Mental Health 2017; NJ USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1002/9781119378785.ch1.

6. Kamat S, Vajaratkar P. Perception of psychiatrists on occupational therapy practice in mental health: A qualitative study. Indian J Occup Ther 2020;52(4):125–131. DOI: 10.4103/ijoth.ijoth_46_21.

7. Miles H, Morley M. Developing mental health occupational therapy practice to meet the needs of people with mental health problems and physical disability. Br J Occup Ther 2013;76(12):556–559. DOI: 10.4276/030802213X13861576675321.

8. Cossar A. The growth of private practice in occupational therapy in Great Britain. Br J Occup Ther 1992;55(4):157–161. DOI: 10.1177/030802269205500412.

9. Shriver DJ. A new arena for private practice in occupational therapy. Occup Ther Health Care 1985;2(2):25–36. DOI: 10.1080/J003v02n02_05.

10. Kautzmann LN. Marketing occupational therapy services. Occup Ther Health Care 1985;2(2):91–101. DOI: 10.1080/J003v02n02_10.

11. Kobbero TK, Lynch CH, Boniface G, et al. Occupational therapy private practice workforce: Issues in the 21st century: La main-œuvre en ergothérapie dans le secteur privé: Les enjeux du 21e siècle. Can J Occup Ther 2018;85(1):58–65. DOI: 10.1177/0008417417719724.

12. Karthik M. Occupational therapy private practice in Tamil Nadu, India: A state-wide survey. VOTC Therapy Newsletter 2017;3–9.

13. Ashby S, Gray M, Ryan S, et al. Maintaining occupation-based practice in Australian mental health practice: A critical stance. Br J Occup Ther 2015;78(7):431–439. DOI: 10.1177/0308022614564168.

14. Xyrichis A, Ream E. Teamwork: A concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008;61(2):232–421. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04496.x.

15. Molineux M, Baptiste S. Emerging occupational therapy practice: Building on the foundations and seizing the opportunities. In: Thew M, Edwards M, Baptiste S, Molineux M (eds); 2011. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 3–14. DOI: 10.1002/9781444340006.ch1.

16. Eklund M. Explicit and implicit methods in psychosocial occupational therapy. Occup Ther Mental Health 2002;18(2):3–15. DOI: 10.1300/J004v18n02_02.

17. Hurff JM, Lowe HE, Ho BJ, et al. Networking: A successful linkage for community occupational therapists. Am J Occup Ther 1990;44(5):424–430. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.44.5.424.

18. Hammell K. Using qualitative research to inform the client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther 2001;64(5):228–234. DOI: 10.1177/030802260106400504.

19. Hitch D, Nicola-Richmond K, Richards K, et al. Student perspectives on factors that influence the implementation of evidence-based practice in occupational therapy. JBI Evid Implement 2021;19(4):409–418. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000285.

20. Lloyd C, Bassett H, King R. Occupational therapy and evidence-based practice in mental health. Br J Occup Ther 2004;67(2)83–88. DOI: 10.1177/030802260406700205.

21. Hilary M. Evidence-based practice in mental health: A cause for concern for occupational therapists. Br J Occup Ther 2003;66(4):168–170. DOI: 10.1177/030802260306600406.

22. Kristensen H, Borg T, Hounsgaard L. Facilitation of research-based evidence within occupational therapy in stroke rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther 2011;74(10):473–483. DOI: 10.4276/030802211X13182481841949.

23. Gibson RW, D’Amico M, Jaffe L, et al. Occupational therapy interventions for recovery in the areas of community integration and normative life roles for adults with serious mental illness: A systematic review. Am J Occup Ther 2011;65(3):247–256. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2011.001297.

24. Fairbairn M, Davidson I. Teachers’ perceptions of the role and effectiveness of occupational therapists in schools. Can J Occup Ther 1993;60(4):185–191. DOI: 10.1177/000841749306000404.

25. Tse S, Hong SI, Wang CW, et al. Gambling behavior and problems among older adults: A systematic review of empirical studies. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2012;67(5):639–652. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbs068.

26. Simpson A, Bowers L, Alexander J, et al. Occupational therapy and multidisciplinary working on acute psychiatric wards: The tompkins acute ward study. Br J Occup Ther 2005;68(12):545–552. DOI: 10.1177/030802260506801203.

27. Rodger S, Thomas Y, Holley S, et al. Increasing the occupational therapy mental health workforce through innovative practice education: A pilot project. Aust Occup Ther J 2009;56(6):409–417. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00806.x.

28. Pradad A, Bhagat A, Padankatti BS. A community day care programme for psychiatric patients: The role of occupational therapy. Int J Rehabil Res 1991;14(2):163–173. DOI: 10.1097/00004356-199106000-00008.

29. Norris S, Bunger T, Courchesne K, et al. Future of mental health occupational therapy: Student perspective and concerns. Occup Ther Health Care 2007;21(1–2):239–253. DOI: 10.1080/J003v21n01_18.

30. Clarke C, Martin M, de Visser R, et al. Sustaining professional identity in practice following role-emerging placements: Opportunities and challenges for occupational therapists. Br J Occup Ther 2015;78(1):42–50. DOI: 10.1177/0308022614561238.